International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 76, Issue 3, Supplement , Pages S58-S63 , 1 March 2010

Radiotherapy Dose–Volume Effects on Salivary Gland Function

  • Joseph O. Deasy, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Joseph O. Deasy, Ph.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4921 Parkview Pl., St. Louis, MO 63110. Tel: (314) 362-1420; Fax: (314) 362-8521
  • ,
  • Vitali Moiseenko, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, British Columbia Cancer Agency–Vancouver Cancer Center, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • ,
  • Lawrence Marks, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
  • ,
  • K.S. Clifford Chao, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Jiho Nam, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
  • ,
  • Avraham Eisbruch, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI

Received 6 February 2009 ,Revised 8 June 2009 ,Accepted 12 June 2009.

  • Image Result

    Stimulated whole mouth salivary measurements vs. mean parotid gland dose. Summary of Washington University stimulated salivary results at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Data showed that when either gla

    Stimulated whole mouth salivary measurements vs. mean parotid gland dose. Summary of Washington University stimulated salivary results at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Data showed that when either gland was spared (<20 Gy mean dose), ratio of post-radiotherapy (RT) to pre-RT flow is usually >0.25. Note, if either gland was highly spared (<10–15 Gy), resulting salivary function will usually be high, regardless of irradiation level of the other parotid gland (data originally presented in Blanco et al. [6], but redrawn here).

  • Image Result
    Mean percentage of reduction in stimulated salivary flow rate vs. mean parotid gland dose for different follow-up durations (8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16). Follow-up durations of 1, 6, and 12 months represen

    Mean percentage of reduction in stimulated salivary flow rate vs. mean parotid gland dose for different follow-up durations (8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16). Follow-up durations of 1, 6, and 12 months represent ranges of 1–1.5, 6–7, and 12 months, respectively. Linear fits of data from different follow-up intervals shown. Dose–response effect appears present at all times, with shift of data to right with time, suggesting functional repair or regeneration.

  • Image Result
    Reported tissue dose required for 50% response for loss of stimulated saliva flow after radiotherapy (RT) for single parotid gland. Endpoint considered in reports was salivary flow reduction to <25%

    Reported tissue dose required for 50% response for loss of stimulated saliva flow after radiotherapy (RT) for single parotid gland. Endpoint considered in reports was salivary flow reduction to <25% (black symbols) or <50% (gray symbols) of pretreatment value. Tissue dose required for 50% response defined as dose at which 50% of patients developed complications. Error bars (if shown) indicate 95% confidence intervals; refer to original publications for exact meaning. 95% Confidence intervals for studies by Munter et al. were estimated from standard errors provided. Lines connect points from data sets with measurements taken at more than one interval after radiotherapy. Most studies used salivary gland scintigraphy. Some studies measured physical production (ipsilateral salivary flow or whole salivary flow; marked with “I” or “W”, respectively). Data from Buus et al. (2) (which did not include preradiotherapy assessments) derived by comparing different regions of parotid gland that had received different doses. Each label gives number of patients. Note, most imaging-derived endpoint data had greater values for tissue dose required for 50% response (TD50) than measured salivary data. CRT = conformal radiotherapy; IMRT = intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

  • Image Result
    Population-based dose vs. local function response (salivary function at rest) from imaging study by Buus et al. (2). Local functional decline in metabolic clearance of parotid salivary glands vs. loca

    Population-based dose vs. local function response (salivary function at rest) from imaging study by Buus et al. (2). Local functional decline in metabolic clearance of parotid salivary glands vs. local dose, according to voxel-by-voxel estimated time-activity curves of intravenously injected C11-methionine. Data points from 12 patients shown, along with best-fit curve and 95% confidence intervals of curve fit. Individual gland curves reported by Buus et al. (2) deviated significantly from this population average curve (reproduced from Buus et al. [2], used with permission.) This population curve demonstrated functional decline in salivary function even at low doses.

 Partially funded by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 CA85181 (to J. O. Deasy) and Grant CA69579 (L. B. Marks) and by the American Association of Medical Physicists and the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology.

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(09)03289-1

doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.090

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 76, Issue 3, Supplement , Pages S58-S63 , 1 March 2010