International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 77, Issue 3 , Pages 942-949, 1 July 2010

Volumetric Modulation Arc Radiotherapy Compared With Static Gantry Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Tumor: A Feasibility Study

  • Marta Scorsetti, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
  • ,
  • Mario Bignardi, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
  • ,
  • Alessandro Clivio, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Luca Cozzi, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Luca Cozzi, Ph.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Medical Physics Unit, Bellinzona 6504 Switzerland. Tel: (+41) 91-811-9202; Fax: (+41) 91-811-8678
  • ,
  • Antonella Fogliata, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Paola Lattuada, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
  • ,
  • Pietro Mancosu, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
  • ,
  • Piera Navarria, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
  • ,
  • Giorgia Nicolini, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Gaetano Urso, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
  • ,
  • Eugenio Vanetti, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Sabrina Vigorito, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
  • ,
  • Armando Santoro, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy

Received 2 June 2009; received in revised form 12 August 2009; accepted 18 September 2009. published online 08 April 2010.

Purpose

A planning study was performed to evaluate RapidArc (RA), a volumetric modulated arc technique, on malignant pleural mesothelioma. The benchmark was conventional fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Methods and materials

The computed tomography data sets of 6 patients were included. The plans for IMRT with nine fixed beams were compared against double-modulated arcs with a single isocenter. All plans were optimized for 15-MV photon beams. The dose prescription was 54 Gy to the planning target volume. The planning objectives for the planning target volume were a minimal dose of >95% and maximal dose of <107%. For the organs at risk, the parameters were as follows: contralateral lung, percentage of volume receiving 5 Gy (V5Gy) <60%, V20Gy < 10%, mean <10.0 Gy; liver, V30Gy <33%, mean <31 Gy; heart, V45Gy <30%, V50Gy <20%, dose received by 1% of the volume (D1%) <60 Gy; contralateral kidney, V15Gy <20%; spine, D1% <45 Gy; esophagus, V55Gy <30%; and spleen, V40Gy <50%. The monitor units (MUs) and delivery time were scored to measure the treatment efficiency. The pretreatment portal dosimetry scored delivery to the calculation agreement with the Gamma Agreement Index.

Results

RA and IMRT provided equivalent coverage and homogeneity. Both techniques fulfilled objectives on organs at risk with a tendency of RA to improve sparing. The conformity index was 1.9 ± 0.1 for RA and IMRT. The number of MU/2Gy was 734 ± 82 for RA and 2,195 ± 317 for IMRT. The planning vs. delivery agreement revealed a Gamma Agreement Index for IMRT of 96.0% ± 2.6% and for RA of 95.7% ± 1.5%. The treatment time was 3.7 ± 0.3min for RA and 13.4 ± 0.1min for IMRT.

Conclusion

RA demonstrated compared with conventional IMRT, similar target coverage and better dose sparing to the organs at risks. The number of MUs and the time required to deliver a 2-Gy fraction were much lower for RA, allowing the possibility to incorporate this technique in the treatment options for mesothelioma patients.

RapidArc, Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, IMRT, mesothelioma

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: L. Cozzi acts as Scientific Advisor to Varian Medical Systems and is Head of Research and Technological Development, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, IOSI, Bellinzona, Italy.

PII: S0360-3016(09)03332-X

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.053

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 77, Issue 3 , Pages 942-949, 1 July 2010