Journal Home
Search for

Articles in Press

Return to articles in press list

The Value of Botox-A in Acute Radiation Proctitis: Results from a Phase I/II Study Using a Three-Dimensional Scoring System

Te VuongCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Kevin Waschke, Tamim Niazi, Carole Richard, Josee Parent, Sender Liberman, Serge Mayrand, Rasmy Loungnarath, Barry Stein, Slobodan Devic§

Received 16 November 2009; received in revised form 30 March 2010; accepted 2 April 2010. published online 26 July 2010.
Corrected Proof

Purpose

Acute radiation proctitis (ARP) is a common side effect of pelvic radiotherapy, and its management is challenging in daily practice. The present phase I/II study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) in ARP treatment for rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT).

Methods and Materials

Fifteen patients, treated with neoadjuvant HDREBT, 26-Gy in 4 fractions, received the study treatment that consisted of a single injection of BTX-A into the rectal wall. The injection was performed post-HDREBT and prior to the development of ARP. The control group, 20 such patients, did not receive the BTX-A injection. Both groups had access to standard treatment with hydrocortisone rectal aerosol foam (Cortifoam) and anti-inflammatory and narcotic medication. The ARP was clinically evaluated by self-administered daily questionnaires using visual analog scores to document frequency and urgency of bowel movements, rectal burning/tenesmus, and pain symptoms before and after HDREBT.

Results

At the time of this analysis, there was no observed systemic toxicity. Patient compliance with the self-administered questionnaire was 100% from week 1 to 4, 70% during week 5, and 40% during week 6. The maximum tolerated dose was established at the 100-U dose level, and noticeable mean differences were observed in bowel frequency (p = 0.016), urgency (p = 0.007), and pain (p = 0.078).

Conclusions

This study confirms the feasibility and efficacy of BTX-A intervention at 100-U dose level for study patients compared to control patients. A phase III study with this dose level is planned to validate these results.

 Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada

 Department of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada

 Department of Colorectal Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada

 Department of Colorectal Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Canada

§ Department of Medical Physics, McGill University, Montréal, Canada

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Te Vuong, Radiation Oncology Department, SMBD Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec H3T 1E2, Canada. Tel: (514) 340-8222, ext: 2073; Fax: (514) 340-7548.

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(10)00590-0

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.017