International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 81, Issue 2 , Pages 439-444, 1 October 2011

Patterns of Response After Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin in Rectal Cancer: Is There Still a Place for Ecoendoscopic Ultrasound?

  • Leire Arbea, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Division, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Leire Arbea, M.D., Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Division, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avda. Pío XII, 36, 31080 Pamplona, Spain. Tel.: +34 948 255400; Fax: +34 948 255500
  • ,
  • Juan A. Díaz-González, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Division, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • ,
  • Jose Carlos Subtil, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Division Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • ,
  • Josu Sola, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • ,
  • Jose Luis Hernandez-Lizoain, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • ,
  • Rafael Martínez-Monge, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Division, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • ,
  • Marta Moreno, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Division, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • ,
  • Javier Aristu, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Division, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

Received 26 February 2010; received in revised form 7 May 2010; accepted 12 May 2010. published online 27 August 2010.

Purpose

The main goals of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CHRT) in rectal cancer are to achieve pathological response and to ensure tumor control with functional surgery when possible. Assessment of the concordance between clinical and pathological responses is necessary to make decisions regarding alternative conservative procedures. The present study evaluates the patterns of response after a preoperative CHRT regimen, and the value of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in assessing response.

Methods and Materials

A total of 51 EUS-staged T3 to T4 and/or N0 to N+ rectal cancer patients received preoperative CHRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy and capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XELOX) followed by radical resection. Clinical response was assesed by EUS. Rates of pathological tumor regression grade (TRG) and lymph node (LN) involvement were determined in the surgical specimen. Clinical and pathological responses were compared, and the accuracy of EUS in assessing response was calculated.

Results

Twenty-four patients (45%) achieved a major pathological response (complete or >95% pathological response (TRG 3+/4)). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of EUS in predicting pathological T response after preoperative CHRT were 77.8%, 37.5%, 60%, and 58%, respectively. The EUS sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value for nodal staging were 44%, 88%, 88%, and 44%, respectively. Furthermore, EUS after CHRT accurately predicted the absence of LN involvement in 7 of 7 patients (100%) with major pathological response of the primary tumor.

Conclusion

Preoperative IMRT with concomitant XELOX induces favorable rates of major pathological response. EUS has a limited ability to predict primary tumor response after preoperative CHRT, but it is useful for accurately determining LN status. EUS may have a potential value in identifying patients with a very low risk of LN involvement in association with a good pathological response as potential candidates for conservative local surgical protocols.

Rectal cancer, Preoperative chemoradiation, Response, Endoscopic ultrasound, Surgery

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 L. Arbea and J.A. Díaz-González, M.D. contributed equally to this study.

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(10)00751-0

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.028

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 81, Issue 2 , Pages 439-444, 1 October 2011