International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 82, Issue 2 , Pages 877-882, 1 February 2012

Long-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer

This paper was presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Radiation OncologySan Diego Convention Center, San Diego, CA. November 2010

  • Christopher R. King, Ph.D., M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Radiation Oncology and Urology, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Christopher R. King, Ph.D., M.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA School of Medicine, 200 UCLA Medical Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095. Tel: (310) 825-9775; FAX: (310) 794-9795
  • ,
  • James D. Brooks, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • ,
  • Harcharan Gill, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • ,
  • Joseph C. Presti Jr., M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Received 18 August 2010; received in revised form 25 October 2010; accepted 2 November 2010. published online 07 February 2011.

Purpose

Hypofractionated radiotherapy has an intrinsically different normal tissue and tumor radiobiology. The results of a prospective trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer with long-term patient-reported toxicity and tumor control rates are presented.

Methods and Materials

From 2003 through 2009, 67 patients with clinically localized low-risk prostate cancer were enrolled. Treatment consisted of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions using SBRT with the CyberKnife as the delivery technology. No patient received hormone therapy. Patient self-reported bladder and rectal toxicities were graded on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale (RTOG).

Results

Median follow-up was 2.7 years. There were no grade 4 toxicities. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3, 2, and 1 bladder toxicities were seen in 3% (2 patients), 5% (3 patients), and 23% (13 patients) respectively. Dysuria exacerbated by urologic instrumentation accounted for both patients with Grade 3 toxicity. Urinary incontinence, complete obstruction, or persistent hematuria was not observed. Rectal Grade 3, 2, and 1 toxicities were seen in 0, 2% (1 patient), and 12.5% (7 patients), respectively. Persistent rectal bleeding was not observed. Low-grade toxicities were substantially less frequent with QOD vs. QD dose regimen (p = 0.001 for gastrointestinal and p = 0.007 for genitourinary). There were two prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy-proven failures with negative metastatic workup. Median PSA at follow-up was 0.5 ± 0.72 ng/mL. The 4-year Kaplan-Meier PSA relapse-free survival was 94% (95% confidence interval, 85%–102%).

Conclusion

Significant late bladder and rectal toxicities from SBRT for prostate cancer are infrequent. PSA relapse-free survival compares favorably with other definitive treatments. The current evidence supports consideration of stereotactic body radiotherapy among the therapeutic options for localized prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer, Stereotactic body radiotherapy, PSA, Hypofractionation, Toxicity

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(10)03677-1

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.054

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 82, Issue 2 , Pages 877-882, 1 February 2012