Falsification, Fabrication, and Plagiarism: The Unholy Trinity of Scientific Writing

      One of the greatest, and sadly all too common, challenges facing a contemporary medical journal editor is the adjudication of ethical integrity issues. I had originally presumed that this would be just an occasional role, but it transpires that these problems are quite widespread, ranging from unconscious and unwitting naiveté to the conscious and willful betrayal of scientific trust.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      ASTRO Member Login
      ASTRO Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Use your society credentials to access all journal content and features.
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Purchase one-time access:

      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Feng F.C.
        • Steen R.G.
        • Casadevall A.
        Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109: 17028-17033
        • Grieneisen M.L.
        • Zhang M.
        A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature.
        PLoS One. 2012; 7: e44118
        • Heitman E.
        • Litewka S.
        International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees.
        Urol Oncol. 2011; 29: 104-108
      1. Committee on Publication Ethics. Code of conduct and best practice guidelines for journal editors. Available at:

        • Begley C.G.
        Six red flags for suspect work.
        Nature. 2013; 497: 433-434

      Linked Article

      • Erratum
        International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • PhysicsVol. 87Issue 5


      Commenting Guidelines

      To submit a comment for a journal article, please use the space above and note the following:

      • We will review submitted comments as soon as possible, striving for within two business days.
      • This forum is intended for constructive dialogue. Comments that are commercial or promotional in nature, pertain to specific medical cases, are not relevant to the article for which they have been submitted, or are otherwise inappropriate will not be posted.
      • We require that commenters identify themselves with names and affiliations.
      • Comments must be in compliance with our Terms & Conditions.
      • Comments are not peer-reviewed.