Advertisement

Single-Blind Trial of Knowledge-Based Automated Planning Versus Manually Planned Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)

      It is imperative to prove that the efficiency gains of automation do not come at the cost of lowered plan quality. The purpose of this work was to compare the plan quality of fully-automated, knowledge-based SRS treatment planning to previously treated clinical SRS cases through a single-blind trial, whereby physicians chose between de-identified manual and automated plans.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      ASTRO Member Login
      ASTRO Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Use your society credentials to access all journal content and features.
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      Comments

      Commenting Guidelines

      To submit a comment for a journal article, please use the space above and note the following:

      • We will review submitted comments as soon as possible, striving for within two business days.
      • This forum is intended for constructive dialogue. Comments that are commercial or promotional in nature, pertain to specific medical cases, are not relevant to the article for which they have been submitted, or are otherwise inappropriate will not be posted.
      • We require that commenters identify themselves with names and affiliations.
      • Comments must be in compliance with our Terms & Conditions.
      • Comments are not peer-reviewed.