Miniaturizing Proton Therapy: A Technical Challenge With Unclear Clinical Impact

      Recent technical developments in proton therapy on the miniaturization of the irradiation equipment and an increasing interest in smaller proton therapy facilities have cheaper therapy and wider use as their goals. Although smaller facilities, and even ones with a single treatment room, are already in clinical operation, the major technological steps to take this to the next level will need a long time until their introduction into clinical practice. This editorial gives an overview of these developments and an explanation of the current situation regarding technological innovations in clinical practice.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      ASTRO Member Login
      ASTRO Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Use your society credentials to access all journal content and features.

      Purchase one-time access:

      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Particle Therapy Cooperative Group. Home page. Available at: Accessed July 31, 2016

        • Langendijk J.A.
        • Lambin P.
        • De Ruyscscher D.
        • et al.
        Selection of patients for radiotherapy with protons aiming at reduction of side effects: The model-based approach.
        Radiother Oncol. 2013; 107: 267-273
      2. Das I.J. Paganettti H. Principles and Practice of Proton Therapy. AAPM Monograph No. 37. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI2015
        • Schippers J.M.
        Chapter 3, Beam delivery systems for particle therapy.
        in: Ma C. Lomax A. Proton and Carbon Ion Therapy. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL2013
        • Pedroni E.
        • Bacher R.
        • Blattmann H.
        • et al.
        The 200 MeV proton therapy project at the Paul Scherrer Institute: Conceptual design and practical realization.
        Med Phys. 1995; 22: 37-53
        • Pedroni E.
        • Bearpark R.
        • Boehringer T.
        • et al.
        The PSI Gantry 2: A second generation proton scanning gantry.
        Z Med Phys. 2004; 14: 25-34
        • Haberer T.
        • Becher W.
        • Schardt D.
        • et al.
        Magnetic scanning system for heavy ion therapy.
        Nucl Instr Meth A. 1993; 330: 296-305
        • Pavlovic M.
        Beam-optics study of the gantry beam delivery system for light-ion cancer therapy.
        Nucl Instr Meth A. 1997; 399: 439-454
      3. Noda K, Furukawa T, Inaniwa T. et al. New heavy-ion cancer treatment facility at HIMAC. Proceedings of EPAC08, Genova, Italy, TUPP125 1818-1820.

        • Pearson E.
        • de Wilde O.
        • Doyen R.
        • et al.
        Magnet developments and commissioning for the IBA compact gantry. 1PoAG-11.
        in: Strauss B. Proc magnet-technology conf. MT-23. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY. VOL. 24, NO. 3. JUNE 2014: 4401004
      4. Sumitomo Heavy Industries. Proton therapy system. Available at: Accessed July 15, 2015.

        • Caspi S.
        • Arbelaez D.
        • Felice H.
        • et al.
        Conceptual design of a 260 mm bore 5T superconducting curved dipole magnet for a carbon beam therapy gantry.
        IEEE Trans Applied Superconductivity. 2012; : 22-25
      5. Wan W., Brouwer L., Caspi S., et al. Alternating gradient canted cosine theta superconducting magnets for future compact proton gantries. Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams 18, 103501 (2015).

        • Trbojevic D.
        Non scaling fixed field alternating gradient gantries.
        in: Sessler A.M. Vaccaro V.G. 2nd Workshop on Hadron Beam Therapy of Cancer, Erice2011
      6. Iwata Y, Noda K, Shirai T, et al. Design of superconducting rotating gantry for heavy-ion therapy. Proceedings of IPAC2012, THPPR047, 2012.

      7. ProNova. Homepage. Available at: Accessed July 15, 2015.

        • Gerbershagen A.
        • Schippers J.M.
        • Meer D.
        • et al.
        A novel beam optics concept in a particle therapy gantry utilizing the advantages of superconducting magnets.
        Z Med Phys. 2016; (In press)
        • Schippers J.M.
        • Lomax A.J.
        Emerging technologies in proton therapy.
        Acta Oncol. 2011; 50: 838-850
        • Schwoerer H.
        • Pfotenhauer S.
        • Jäckel O.
        • et al.
        Laser-plasma acceleration of quasi-monoenergetic protons from microstructured targets.
        Nature. 2006; 439: 445-448
        • Amaldi U.
        High frequency linacs for hads and their applications rontherapy.
        Rev Accelerator Sci Technol. 2009; 2: 111-131
      8. Mori Y. Recent development of FFAG accelerators and their applications. In: Chin H, editor. Proceedings of 39th Advanced Beam Dynamics workshop on High Intensity High Brightness Hadron beams (HB2006), p16-19.

        • Umezawa M.
        Hitachi Proton Beam Therapy System, in: Particle beam therapy symposium.
        55th AAPM Annual Meeting. Aug. 3 2013;
        • Schillo M.
        • Geisler A.
        • Hobl A.
        • et al.
        Compact superconducting 250 MeV proton cyclotron for the PSI PROSCAN proton therapy project.
        in: Marti F. Cyclotrons and Their Applications 2001, Sixteenth International Conference. American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD2001: 37-39
      9. Mevion. Home page. Available at: Accessed July 15, 2015.


      Commenting Guidelines

      To submit a comment for a journal article, please use the space above and note the following:

      • We will review submitted comments as soon as possible, striving for within two business days.
      • This forum is intended for constructive dialogue. Comments that are commercial or promotional in nature, pertain to specific medical cases, are not relevant to the article for which they have been submitted, or are otherwise inappropriate will not be posted.
      • We require that commenters identify themselves with names and affiliations.
      • Comments must be in compliance with our Terms & Conditions.
      • Comments are not peer-reviewed.