I read with interest the article by Wu et al on radiation planning.
1
We have also examined this subject in detail.
2
Their low response rate of 33% is of concern, of course, because of the possibility
of responder bias.
1
It would have been reasonable to send further reminders.To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
ASTRO Member Login
ASTRO Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Use your society credentials to access all journal content and features.
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Purchase one-time access:
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Targeted needs assessment of treatment planning education for United States radiation oncology residents.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020; 106: 677-682
- Contouring experiences amongst Australian, New Zealand and Singaporean radiation oncology trainees. Is it enough? What next?.J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019; 63: 383-389
Article Info
Footnotes
Disclosures: none.
Identification
Copyright
© 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
